My KCC Election Manifesto & Video

Sunday, 28 December 2014

Ramsgate Port Slag Heaps & Pallet Mountains

I’m  very worried about  proposals to locate  waste wood processing and concrete block production facilities  at the port of Ramsgate. The proposals have been made by the O’Regan Group.  According to the company check website, DueDil, the group doesn’t appear to be financially robust. Most of the companies within the organisation have negative financial valuations, or are dormant with no recent trading history and no accounts submitted. Although it’s very worrying that an organisation which intends to develop a large industrial processing facility at Ramsgate Port, does not appear to have much money, my foremost concern is the impact that these activities might have upon the town and its residents.  According to documents produced by the O’Regan Group their concrete block manufacturing and waste wood processing operations will take up about one third of the port area. The production of concrete blocks will require the delivery by sea of vast quantities of aggregates which will be stock piled in large slag heaps several metres high. The waste wood processing plant will be supplied by road creating massive mountains of pallets etc. The operations are likely to generate considerable noise and dust, which, considering the close proximity of residential areas of Ramsgate to the Port, could be very

problematic. There will also be a significant increase in lorry movements to and from the port resulting from the O’Regan operation and an elevated risk of fire due the vast quantities of flammable wood which will be stored at the port. Last but not least, what impact will these operations have on the quality of our bathing waters and beaches and on the nearby nature conservancy and scientific interest sites?

I was taken aback to learn that O’Regan’s proposals are being piloted through the council system by 2 former, and very senior TDC planning managers. Not that I am suggesting anything untoward or improper, but I am  mindful of comments made by anti-corruption charity Transparency International, in their 2013 publication, Corruption in UK Local Government, which warn of the possibility that former council officers who are now working for the private sector “might influence his or her former colleagues in a way that favours the company” the former officer is representing. Because this proposals is likely to subject to planning permission and because O’Regan’s agents were formerly very senior planning officers, this an application which must be managed with the fullest transparency and sensitivity.

Finally, I have long argued, that the future of Ramsgate Port is best served by its transformation into a modern marina. Newhaven, Brighton and  Eastbourne marinas have all demonstrated that sustainable and very successful businesses can be developed by investing in leisure based  marine activities. They have created hundreds of local jobs and many opportunities for local business. In my opinion developing Ramsgate Port into a modern marina, rather than a noisy, dusty and potentially polluting industrial facility, is the best solution to regenerating the local economy, creating jobs and attracting more visitors.


I'm  sure I will be saying a lot more about this wrongheaded plan in the next few weeks.

8 comments:

  1. Who are the 2 former TDC officials Ian? And what are the running costs of the Port at the moment - there seems to have been inaction apart from this awful proposal for months and years?

    ReplyDelete
  2. That space should be reorganised for seafarers/boat repairs, fish market, artist's studios, and more and a whole load of new parking for tourists and residents wanting to benefit from what the seafront and town has to offer!
    Perhaps TDC's communications team when they read this can advise RTC on PR for the town and get the CEO behind supporting Ramsgate as a great place to live and tourist destination. There are so many people who are now committed to move here from central London, especially from the creative industries and they are choosing Ramsgate over Margate! C'mon TDC and RTC wake-up to what is happening here and say no to O'Regan and don't drag it out like the airport debacle. This is yet another genuinely environmentally toxic project for Rammers. Let them do their recycling elsewhere. Ramsgate is a bit like an old tart, dodgy businesses see an opening and just shaft it! I think most people will understand that metaphor! We want better!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. O' Kin El, here we go again Ramsgate has to defend itself from out of order development which will not fit all the other plans. Do we have the strength of leadership to resist this attack and fast enough to stop it in its tracks.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Luvvly jubbly. That leaves two thirds of port area to receive by sea the massive tonnage of mercury sludge that Thor Chemicals dumped in South Africa. Burying waste in concrete blocks (with marble dust for radioactive

    Can you see a plan coming together Ian ?

    ReplyDelete
  5. New parking at the port? That's as dodgy as your old tart metaphor 16:14, or just limp

    ReplyDelete
  6. Who to blame for both the Port and Pleasurama lying derelict for years in the centre of Ramsgate? Any sensible council who have sorted both out years ago. Also Dreamland in the centre of Margate.

    What is the Mayor of Ramsgate and Bob and Iris and Madeline Homer doing? It's as if they're know-nothing overpaid numpties waiting for the next election.

    What is the Pleasurama valuation and where is macgonigal? We are paying for both with our tax?

    ReplyDelete
  7. before they even ask for planning the nimbys are already up in arms

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yes, who are the two former senior TDC officers? Can they not be named? Can see no confidentiality issue. Are they the ones involved in the Transeuropa secret non-payment deal?

    ReplyDelete